February 3, 2016

There hasnt been a lot of progress on the Nissan lately so I thought I would upload a short video of some muscle cars I saw. This just a small slice of a huge private car collection that I was able to see in Minnesota.

GD V2 – Part 8

January 17, 2016

The engine is now pretty much all apart, with the bottom end completely disassembled. I was finally able to get a superficial look at the condition of the components on the bottom end. So far all the bearings, both crank and big end look in amazing shape; it almost seems a shame that I am going to replace them all. The cylinder bores also looked in great shape, with all the honing marks from production still visible in all the cylinders.

From an initial look I don’t think I will be going for oversize pistons, and save myself the additional work of boring the cylinders; but I will need to measure them for ovality before I make a final decision.
The next steps on the engine now are to remove the final pieces from the crankcase and then get it sent for cleaning, then I also need to finish disassembling the head, which can then also be sent for cleaning. In the meantime I will need to go through the process of measuring the crank to check wear. Once everything is measured I can begin ordering the bottom end parts.

GD V2 Part 7

January 16, 2016

More progress on the engine. Took the top end off and then was finally able to remove the timing chain.

The bottom end can now come out, which is what I will be carrying out tomorrow. Once everything is apart I can begin inspecting the condition of all the components and ordering the bottom end parts.

The head work will carry on through out the week as I’ll be taking it with me to work where they have the necessary tools.

GD Aero Additions & CFD

January 10, 2016

This is something a bit different from normal. I’ve wanted to perform some CFD on the car for quite a while now and decided to start tackling this as a fun side project. The usefulness of CFD, especially when inexperienced in it, is always questionable, but hopefully down the line I will learn more about its methods and improve my models with time. I have little to no experience with CFD so take these results with a huge pinch of salt.

I decided to start with some basic 2D analyses for ease and simplicity; a 3D model would be both extremely time consuming and ultimately futile. I utilised Ansys’ Fluent software with 2D profiles created in Creo 3.
The main purpose was to look at and compare pressure and velocity profiles when the splitter and wing are added. Due to the simplicity of the model with an inviscid fluid the absolute results will not be very accurate so I am merely comparing them to one another and looking at the percentage differences. If anything these are more like pretty pictures to look at. With that being said it is clear that the aero additions have a significant effect.

The Vehicle Profile:
This was initially traced from a blue print of a Nissan 200SX S14A. The undertray was modelled to include some of the prominent features on the car; with the profile of the floor of the car being very different in various places I tried to include things such as the front sub-frame, void behind the engine, rear sub-frame and boot profile.

There are 3 profiles: V1 (standard), V1.5 (with splitter added) and V2 (wing and splitter added).

Setup:
As mentioned before this analysis was done with an inviscid fluid (ideal fluid with no viscosity) so this will add a reasonable amount of error, but it still shows the effects of the aero additions well. The air velocity was set to 100km/h. With no viscosity or surface friction the Cd is not at all accurate and is ignored. The Cl (lift) is compared between models.

Results:

In the graphical results all the scales between each version are the same.
The pressure distribution gives you a good idea of the lift being generated at different parts along the car. At V1 it can be clearly seen that there is quite a high pressure under the front of the car as air is forced down under it; this is generating quite a lot of lift. There are a few high pressure points at the windscreen and boot, which are to be expected, but the low pressure above the roof as the air is sped up over will also generate a lot of lift when you compare it to the pressure under the car.

The addition of the splitter makes a huge difference to the underbody pressure. The air hitting the front is forced up limiting the airflow under the car; not only is the pressure under the engine lower but the pressure differential between the top and bottom of the splitter will created quite a lot of downforce as well; it shows how stiff and well supported the splitter needs to be. I was surprised just how noticeable the effect of the splitter is and this should create a noticeable difference to the car.

Swapping the spoiler at the back for a wing performs as you’d expect; high pressure above and lower underneath generating downforce. In future iterations I am going to measure the lift of the wing at various places to see where it may be most effective, or if it matters at all.

With the addition of the splitter (V1.5) the lift decreased by 46%, while the wing further decrease the lift by 16%.

The streamlines shown in this picture again clearly show the effectiveness of the splitter. The air being forced up allowing for a limited amount of air to go underneath at a much greater speed. This higher pressure at the front and lower pressure under the car should also increase the effectiveness of the intercooler and radiator, creating a bigger pressure differential across them.

The results once again show the wing at the rear functioning by the higher speed beneath it. Although there is quite a lot of separation behind the wing indicating that the angle of attack is too high, but its difficult to read into the boundary layers due to the accuracy of the model.

The next steps will be to continuously improve the model and look at different aero additions. I would like to investigate the position of the wing as mentioned and also look at the effect of adding a diffusor at the rear.

GD V2 – Part 6

January 2, 2016

Started snowing today so it was a great excuse to stay indoors and plow on with the engine work. Transmission, entire intake system, heat exchanger & oil filter, clutch and flywheel disassembled so the engine can be mounted to the stand.

Then just continued taking everything off; chain tensioner, cam angle sensor, water pump and cam cover off.

Next I will be proceeding by removing the oil pan, sump, cams and then the chain can come out. Then I can proceed with the head work, which I will probably carry out at work in the workshop as they have all the specialist tools.

GD V2 – Part 5

January 2, 2016

Engine is out and now the work can really start. The engine was removed with the transmission, and also gear stick, which made it a tough task but luckily it just squeezed out. Next steps are to remove the transmission and load the engine onto the stand and begin disassembly. At the moment I am still not fully aware of what I will upgrade as I’m going to analyse the condition of the components as I go along. Bottom end will likely be all forged with new bearings but I’m still unsure about the top end.

With the engine out I can also start work in the engine bay; a lot of repair and tidying up is necessary. There is corrosion between the rails and the strut panel which I will replace, and various areas of surface rust. I will also paint as much of the engine bay as I can once its all repaired. There are also a lot of unnecessary parts in the engine bay that have been left over such as air conditioning lines and fuel tank vent lines which will be removed or trimmed. I may also trim the battery tray out with the battery now being located in the boot.

I received a few additional components for the build. Nismo 740cc injectors and an Apexi PowerFC D-Jetro.

December 30, 2015

S U P E R T O U R I N G L O V E
Mid-Late 90s Super Touring – Ridiculously fast, impossibly cool.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 280 other followers